วันอาทิตย์ที่ 13 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2552

Cultural Creative Models II

Kevin Trudeau's excellent book, "Natural Cures 'They' Don't Want You to Know About" is a double whammy on industrial - corporate greed. Not only does he hammer home the point entire industries are profiting by causing sickness and death on a global scale, he lays bare the reasons why we call it health care, when it is truly sick care and it will never solve the health problems it often causes in the first place.

The reader gets hammered with the message to remember it is always all about the money. The average American and European suspects this is the case. Kevin removes all doubt. Kevin, who has been attacked in the past by government bureaucracies for making health claims about products he was selling, such as coral calcium, has desisted from selling health products but freely recommends the best he and alternative health professionals have found to be effective in reversing disease and probably aging.

The other side of his double whammy is his unapologetic promotion of organic food, pure water, clean air and energy balancing for home and body. All things the professional quacks are quick to call quackery. The organic food industry, one of the most honest and beneficial on the planet has been enjoying excellent growth over the past few years, because word is spreading that you pay a premium for the very best food, which creates the very best health. Yet a skillfull shopper of organic food, especially bulk dry goods can eat for far less money, than buying the poisons offered in the local supermarkets. Even these markets are adding organic products because they can see the writing on the New Age wall. Consumers are wising up. Kevin is doing all he can to accellerate the process.

He has wisely chosen to restrict his product offering to information, the most difficult product for the money loving bureaucrats to interfere with Kevin's marketing. Each time some state attorney general decides Kevin will not market his book in their money loving state, Kevin sues. I wonder what would happen if the Gates Foundation threw in with Kevin and company.

He does not come out and say so in his book, yet he makes it perfectly clear, agribusiness, water companies, pharmaceuticals, medicine, government, food processors and marketers are all promoting suicidal weapons of mass destruction to consumers. "Here, consume this poison and call your doctor. Now!"

The book is a best seller despite attempts by these industries to silence Kevin and block the marketing of his book. Each copy sold, increases his war chest and teaches consumers, who get no respect in the marketplace, how by taking small but effective steps in daily lifestyle, we can drive greedy murderers out of the marketplace. Maybe even prevent them from exporting their sickness and disease to the poor countries which already have more than they need from chronic malnutrition and foul water.

His book can save and lengthen your life and improve it's quality from the time you take your first small steps. He will surely become the clearing house and testing mechanism for many new alternative health discoveries coming down the road. He has already begun organizing alternative health care providers by creating directories on the subscription portion of his website; Natural Cures.com. He knows marketing and will multiply his company profits as he increases the profitability of organic food marketing, water purification products, energy field generators and all the tested and proven alternatives to toxic food and medicine. Give him his white hat. Few are doing more to reverse the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual degeneration of humanity. Buy his book, buy his other products, subscribe to his website and you will be blessing all humanity. If you save and improve your own life as a fringe benefit, you have gained wisdom.



Buddy ครบ 10 ปี มาสร้าง Strip การ์ตูนสำหรับปาร์ตี้เพื่อชนะรางวัล $1,000 คลิกที่นี่เลย

วันพุธที่ 9 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2552

Intellectual Property will soon be History

It is not too risky to affirm that intellectual property will soon be History.

Rules designed for the paper era are not useful, enforceable and cost-economic in the Web era.

Here are a few reasons:

1) Intellectual property is not designed for the Web times

I strongly believe that intellectual property will soon be history, not because Anarchism will succeed over Capitalism, but because the Net Economy will find new ways to control ownership of words and patents.

Words alone are mostly worthless. Nobody is able to make money out of them anymore. Let's take someone whose words are unique and valuable: Gabriel Garcia Marquez, for instance. He collects some royalties from his writings, except for:

- the 50% cut that makes his publisher - the 40% lost to piracy - the 5% cut from the book physical maker - 3% from government taxes -1% from his agent, lawyer and accountant

So, the Paper Economy offers him 1% of the potential profit from his words.

On the other hand, what happens when you write for the Web?

Most word-content websites have lost money permanently since the 2000 Net Bubble. Even for prime authors, like Rawlings and her Harry Potter, plagiarism has eaten half of the earnings.

Making money out of words in the web takes a little more than writing. You need to point the words to those that might buy something related to them. You also need to secure some form of collecting money and measuring your response rates. The webmaster and the site promoter replace here the publisher.

2) Writing for the Web is different than writing for paper

There are:

- few authors that know how to write for the Web (short, focused, adjustable to the reader preference, keyword-dense, sticky, connected with a merchandise or service)

- few publishers that know how to make money in the Web starting from printed words from the paper era

- few webmasters who can transform electronic words in non-electronic dollars, either dealing with authors or conventional publishers

The Web Word Market is more dynamic, focused and automated than the Paper Word Market. In the past, the unit was the book, because you needed to print it, distribute it and sell it. Now, the unit is the web page, a much smaller one. Or maybe the RSS feed, the article, the forum posting or other smaller dynamic forms.

3) Authors are not so valuable in the Web Economy

Names and brands are less important in the web, because nobody spends too much time in one place, and the average user looks for specific answers rather than just a pleasant reading time.

Can you name a single Web author that always calls your attention? Are there any Web equivalents to Garcia Marquez or Norman Mailer? There are blog authors that have followers, but their names are not relevant. And the blogs with its traffic can easily be sold to someone else.

By the way, names and pen names are out. A famous person in my own field (SEO, or search engine optimizing) is GoogleGuy. A good, sticky name with 2 relevant keywords in it. I don't care if his real name is John Smith or Anand Brahmaputra. My own name is Sergio Samoilovich, but I would like to change it to Synonymizer, for e-marketing purposes. When I was trying to sell my netic.com domain I signed Neticman. I own many domains related to different products I sell. I might also own as many virtual names.

And how about pen names similar to Indian names: Man-who-blogs-for-a-living, Webcam-Girl, Pervasive-Word-Marketer or the like...

Targeting the right audience and positioning your website in the Search Engines under the proper keywords is more important than winning a Nobel Prize or a famed contest. Success is now measured in ad revenue rather than books sold.

My point is that in the Web, being the author of something is not that important. What is important, is to own targeted traffic that can buy a product by that author or any other. You can always find an author offering his product thru an Affiliate program, which equals sharing profits with you, the e-marketer. Experts can turn a bad author into good web stuff.

4) Plagiarism is not well defined

So far, there is not linguistic or mathematic rule for plagiarism. It is up to the lawyers to define fair use or unfair use. This makes litigation very difficult. Some guidelines are mentioned usually in University sites, advising students not to use other's words without permission, but they rarely express a numeric limit between quoting and plagiarizing.

Besides, some plagiarism rules are non-enforceable.

For instance, there is a problem when you plagiarize a short text without noticing it. To prevent that, there should be a central database or clearinghouse in the Web that you could run your text against, in order to validate it. If I used a phrase like 'New York Times' I will probably will run into the newspaper attorneys, even if I was thinking about the weather in the big apple.

5) Plagiarism is not easily detectable.

It is also a complication the fact that the web is a dynamic medium, and there are no hard proofs of most infringements.

Plagiarism is non-detectable when the author makes slight modifications in the copied text. There is no computer in the world able to read the whole Web and find all the similar phrases or web pages. The main plagiarism detection systems work by sampling the suspected originals and copies, and those small samples can be wrong: either false positives or false negatives are possible.

Software like Synonymizer makes it easy for webmaster to create almost-duplicate text, barely detectable for the search engines.

Finding plagiarists and punishing is very difficult. The web is mostly distributed and anonymous.

Thus, a significant business is surging from the plagiarism-detection needs of authors, universities and publishers.

The anti-plagiarism-detection tool market is also surging.

6) Google is the leader in electronic detection and punishment of plagiarism

So far, Google has some filters that reject duplication from its index, and attempt to give credit to the original author.

For me, it is obvious that some software should take care of the plagiarism issues, instead of the expensive and unpredictable lawyers and judges. With previsions for Synonymizing.

Some kind of web service (the Web Economy) will rate the originality of your words, the value for the customers, the degree of infringement of the laws, and will provide you a reward : traffic that you can monetize. Or a punishment: exclusion from the main listings.

At this point, the Web Economy is doing that: rewarding originality and witness, punishing duplication and dumbness.

Garcia Marquez could profit from AdSense and other ad servers, and there would be little intermediation.

Maybe a small 'Plagiarism Algorithm' in Google and Yahoo can and will replace Intellectual Property Lawyers... It will be cheaper, faster and radically more effective.



ด้วย Windows Live คุณสามารถจัดการ แก้ไข และ แบ่งปันภาพถ่ายของคุณ

วันเสาร์ที่ 5 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2552

"No Win...No Pay...No Risk" Lawsuit Cash Advance Bridges Financial Gap Waiting For Settlement Creates

No Win...No Pay...No Risk" Lawsuit Cash Advance Bridges Financial Gap Waiting For Settlement Creates "No one pays much attention to how a person who has been injured is going to live while waiting for a case to go to trial. The legal system tends to put people who cannot afford to wait for their money at a disadvantage." - Boston Bar Association Ethics Committee Chairman, Gerry Cohen

With these words millions of U.S. consumers every year find out 1st hand the truthfulness of Mr. Cohen's assessment of the legal and the insurance system. "It's a painful experience one I hope I never have to endure again" describes litigant Kari Spears regarding her dealing with the insurance company liable when she had an auto accident in 1997. The "extreme financial hardship & pressure we endured can be described as a nightmare for my children and I as we lived a total life change in one evening."

Many litigants describe their experience as "being left out to dry by the insurance industry" and one of being "no one cares how much suffering we really experience." The costs injured plaintiffs sustain are far more than the actual pain and suffering, as Spears states, "injuries affect everything including your standard of living, as an injured person just can't maintain the same earnings after an accident vs. prior to one. Then throw in future credit and borrowing issues and you begin to know the real long term side effects no one takes into consideration."

Is there a solution? 1st Choice Funding says so as it has taken the "bull by the horns" by offering litigants nationwide the opportunity to have cash in hand now, when plaintiffs need it most vs. when settlement finally occurs. The program is called "No Win...No Pay... No Risk" Lawsuit Cash Advance , and this innovative program puts litigants in the position to receive cash prior to settlement with no credit, no employment, no monthly payments, no collateral, and no risk for repayment if a pending case is not successfully litigated.

The "No Win...No Pay... No Risk" Lawsuit Cash Advance even works for plaintiffs who have a settlement but who are waiting for distribution, as many plaintiffs who have won their case have waited so long for a victory, that waiting months to receive settlement creates financial hardship. The "No Risk" program provides a solution to plaintiffs now.

"No Win...No Pay... No Risk" Lawsuit Cash Advance is unheard of from traditional banking approaches to lending money conventional lenders agree. "1st Choice Funding's Lawsuit Cash Advance isn't really a loan at all and that's why conventional approaches aren't how we make determinations for funding" said company president Timothy S. Gray, "Lawsuit Cash Advance" is what consumers call them but in reality what they are advances made on future settlement, and that's something conventional lenders just don't understand."

"No Win...No Pay...No Risk" Lawsuit Cash Advance is an answer to many prayers as litigants who have seized the opportunity are no longer forced into early settlement due to financial hardship. Lawsuit Cash Advance can even mean the difference of thousands of extra dollars at the time of settlement for litigant and their attorney because time is money and money now staves off the insurance companies stall tactics as plaintiffs are not forced into early settlement for less money later.

Make no mistake delayed settlements are no coincidence; the insurance industry has capitalized on the added profits obtained from the interest earned time generates as well as what settlement for pennies on the dollar does for their bottom line when litigants are forced into financial hardship.

To find out more about this innovative service, log onto the company website at http://1stchoicefunding.com and see for yourself what innovation at work can do in providing millions with a long past due financial remedy.



ถูกพบอยู่กับ Buddy! แท็กรูปของคุณแล้วลุ้นคว้ารางวัลอันน่าตื่นตาตื่นใจ คลิกที่นี่เลย