Until recently lawyers for victims of credit damage had little possibility to
collect for damages beyond medical treatment, lost wages and property loss.
Insurance companies threw up their hands in sympathy, claiming victims can only
be compensated for what can be measured tangible goods and services. But, what
happens when the victim has lost considerable time from work, the family bank is
broke and monthly payments on mortgages, car loans and credit cards payments are
missed? Regardless of the haggling between lawyers and insurance companies, its
the credit victim who ends up having to live with a bad credit rating. Today,
there are legally accepted means for measuring loss of credit through the
procedure of Credit Damage Measurement (CDM). CDM is fast becoming a potent tool
for recoverable credit damage awards when the damage is not self-inflicted.
Previously, both judge and jury, and especially the insurance companies, refused
to acknowledge CDM claiming it was speculative because they could not define it
as tangible damage. However, in case after case, victims of credit damage who
use the CDM method are getting compensation for credit loss. Many factors are
changing the old mindset including credit bureau technology improvements, the
application of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), risk scoring
sophistication, and the development of CDM as an objective, repeatable method
that measures out-of-pocket damage reliably. Credit Ratings and RecoveryThe
impact of a bad credit rating is much more significant than most people think.
Consider what poorly rated consumers face when they want to lease or buy
vehicles, obtain credit cards, buy or lease or refinance their residence. In
most cases, its an easy decision for the creditor: the credit application is
simply turned down or the borrower is charged a much higher down payment maybe
thousands of dollars more with monthly payments that are typically several
hundred dollars more. A person with bad credit is viewed with suspicion and is
charged significantly more for future extension of credit because the lender
feels the need to protect against a greater risk or default, says Tom Key, a
civil litigator practicing in Tustin, CA. Over the years I have heard reports of
financial damages from clients who have been wrongfully terminated, defrauded,
injured in an accident or suffered losses from breach of contract, Key says.
These victims were especially distraught over the fact that their prime credit
reputation, carefully nurtured for years, is destroyed overnight. It seemed to
me that there must be a way to compensate victims for that type of loss. Key has
witnessed the reactions of many jurors who failed to award a victim of credit
damage their rightful compensation simply because they could not quantify the
damages. Jurors want a specific loss that they can count, hold and see, says
Key. Their reasoning is that they need to know that it is genuine. They have a
tough time awarding damages based on sympathy. In order for them to confirm
authenticity of a claim, they want to see its quantification. Measuring Loss of
CreditworthinessAssuring authenticity has been a sticky situation when it
concerns measuring out-of-pocket loss for victims of credit damage until now.
Attorneys who represent victims of credit damage are now utilizing the Credit
Damage Measurement method to recover out-of-pocket losses for their clients. CDM
measures the actual out-of-pocket dollars reasonably expected from loss of
creditworthiness, which includes higher down payments, higher points and costs
on loans, higher interest rates, higher monthly payments, or outright denial of
credit, says Key. In addition, the CDM method also calculates the rates, costs
and other terms applicable to the resulting credit rating by lenders and
projects the results over the relevant number of years for the types of loans
the client is likely to seek.Key continues, For example, if a clients credit was
near perfect before a triggering event, and is subsequently damaged by the
event, the CDM procedure can illustrate before and after analyses, calculating
the cost of the same loans with the two different credit reports, Pre- injury
credit compared to Post-injury credit. In many cases, CDM clients have already
realized significant compensation. In one such case CDM was instrumental in
recovering $56,000 for damaged credit reputation. That calculation is the
difference between what refinancing a $140,000 loan would have cost my client
with their prior rating, and what it will cost them out-of-pocket with their
damaged credit rating measured over a seven-year period.Isolated Compensation
vs. Repeatable CompensationThe CDM method of measuring intangible credit loss is
increasingly becoming the basis of recovery for victims of credit damage. Its
changing the way judges and juries measure recoverable out-of-pocket loss, and
then can compensate for loss of credit expectancy. Certainly there are still
some skeptics, mostly defendants. Technically, credit damage measurement is
intangible. However, CDM has proven an objective and practical procedure to
calculate out-of-pocket damage for companies or families to compensate for their
credit damage.To have this kind of measurement is an exciting complexity in our
society, says Key. CDM is very understandable and a rather simple way to come to
a conclusion of loss for the victim. If you understand the math and are an
expert at reading credit reports, the calculations and recovery are undeniable.
Its a method of turning isolated compensation into repeatable compensation. Its
changing the way jurors rule on these damaging cases. Because of this method,
victims of credit damage can be more fairly and more completely compensated for
out-of-pocket damage.Today, there are legally accepted means for measuring loss
of credit through the procedure of Credit Damage Measurement (CDM). CDM is fast
becoming a potent tool for recoverable credit damage awards when the damage is
not self-inflicted. Previously, both judge and jury, and especially the
insurance companies, refused to acknowledge CDM claiming it was speculative
because they could not define it as tangible damage. However, in case after
case, victims of credit damage who use the CDM method are getting compensation
for credit loss. Many factors are changing the old mindset including credit
bureau technology improvements, the application of the Fair Credit Reporting Act
(FCRA), risk scoring sophistication, and the development of CDM as an objective,
repeatable method that measures out-of-pocket damage reliably. Credit Ratings
and RecoveryThe impact of a bad credit rating is much more significant than most
people think. Consider what poorly rated consumers face when they want to lease
or buy vehicles, obtain credit cards, buy or lease or refinance their residence.
In most cases, its an easy decision for the creditor: the credit application is
simply turned down or the borrower is charged a much higher down payment maybe
thousands of dollars more with monthly payments that are typically several
hundred dollars more. A person with bad credit is viewed with suspicion and is
charged significantly more for future extension of credit because the lender
feels the need to protect against a greater risk or default, says Tom Key, a
civil litigator practicing in Tustin, CA. Over the years I have heard reports of
financial damages from clients who have been wrongfully terminated, defrauded,
injured in an accident or suffered losses from breach of contract, Key says.
These victims were especially distraught over the fact that their prime credit
reputation, carefully nurtured for years, is destroyed overnight. It seemed to
me that there must be a way to compensate victims for that type of loss. Key has
witnessed the reactions of many jurors who failed to award a victim of credit
damage their rightful compensation simply because they could not quantify the
damages. Jurors want a specific loss that they can count, hold and see, says
Key. Their reasoning is that they need to know that it is genuine. They have a
tough time awarding damages based on sympathy. In order for them to confirm
authenticity of a claim, they want to see its quantification. Measuring Loss of
CreditworthinessAssuring authenticity has been a sticky situation when it
concerns measuring out-of-pocket loss for victims of credit damage until now.
Attorneys who represent victims of credit damage are now utilizing the Credit
Damage Measurement method to recover out-of-pocket losses for their clients. CDM
measures the actual out-of-pocket dollars reasonably expected from loss of
creditworthiness, which includes higher down payments, higher points and costs
on loans, higher interest rates, higher monthly payments, or outright denial of
credit, says Key. In addition, the CDM method also calculates the rates, costs
and other terms applicable to the resulting credit rating by lenders and
projects the results over the relevant number of years for the types of loans
the client is likely to seek.Key continues, For example, if a clients credit was
near perfect before a triggering event, and is subsequently damaged by the
event, the CDM procedure can illustrate before and after analyses, calculating
the cost of the same loans with the two different credit reports, Pre- injury
credit compared to Post-injury credit. In many cases, CDM clients have already
realized significant compensation. In one such case CDM was instrumental in
recovering $56,000 for damaged credit reputation. That calculation is the
difference between what refinancing a $140,000 loan would have cost my client
with their prior rating, and what it will cost them out-of-pocket with their
damaged credit rating measured over a seven-year period.Isolated Compensation
vs. Repeatable CompensationThe CDM method of measuring intangible credit loss is
increasingly becoming the basis of recovery for victims of credit damage. Its
changing the way judges and juries measure recoverable out-of-pocket loss, and
then can compensate for loss of credit expectancy. Certainly there are still
some skeptics, mostly defendants. Technically, credit damage measurement is
intangible. However, CDM has proven an objective and practical procedure to
calculate out-of-pocket damage for companies or families to compensate for their
credit damage.To have this kind of measurement is an exciting complexity in our
society, says Key. CDM is very understandable and a rather simple way to come to
a conclusion of loss for the victim. If you understand the math and are an
expert at reading credit reports, the calculations and recovery are undeniable.
Its a method of turning isolated compensation into repeatable compensation. Its
changing the way jurors rule on these damaging cases. Because of this method,
victims of credit damage can be more fairly and more completely compensated for
out-of-pocket damage. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Georg Finder, president of CM
Financial Services of Fullerton, California, wrote and presents the first State
Bar accepted continuing legal education seminar on credit reports and credit
damage. He can be reached at (714) 441-0900 or at www.creditdamage.com
You may view the latest post at
http://www.richproject.co.cc/?p=3829
You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.
Best regards,
admin
k_malee@hotmail.com
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น